Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sereika v Cardinal Financial Securities Ltd [2001] FCA 208
Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) ss 33C & 33H Federal Court Rules O 73 r 3
Phillip Morris (Australia) Ltd v Nixon (2000) 170 ALR 487 cited Bond Corporation Pty Limited v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (1987) 71 ALR 615 applied JOHN ANTHONY SEREIKA v CARDINAL FINANCIAL SECURITIES LIMITED (formerly INTEQ CUSTODIANS LIMITED), PHILLIP WASS, LYALL WILLIAMS, STEVEN SEREIKA, STAPLETON PARTNERS PTY LIMITED, COOPERS & LYBRAND LIMITED, AUSTRALIAN TEA TREE MANAGEMENT LIMITED, TEA TREE PLANTATION LIMITED AND FARM FINANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED now known as LANDMARK FINANCE PTY LIMITED N 654 of 2000 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 9 MARCH 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 654 OF 2000
BETWEEN: JOHN ANTHONY SEREIKA
APPLICANT
AND: CARDINAL FINANCIAL SECURITIES LIMITED formerly INTEQ CUSTODIANS LIMITED (ACN 058 560 212)
FIRST RESPONDENT
PHILLIP WASS
SECOND RESPONDENT
LYALL WILLIAMS
THIRD RESPONDENT
STEVEN SEREIKA
FOURTH RESPONDENT
STAPLETON PARTNERS PTY LIMITED (ACN 051 887 748)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
COOPERS & LYBRAND (Securities) LIMITED
(ACN 003 311 617)
SIXTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN TEA TREE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(ACN 064 159 842)
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
TEA TREE PLANTATION LIMITED (ACN 175 869 402)
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
FARM FINANCE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED now known as LANDMARK FINANCE PTY LIMITED (ACN 076 073 017)
NINTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 MARCH 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate