Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ardelle v Spastic Society of Victoria Ltd [2001] FCA 220
INDUSTRIAL LAW – underpayment of wages – breach or non–observance of the Health Services Union of Australia (Private Sector) Interim Award 1993 and the Health (Residential Care – Victoria) Award 1995 – interpretation of applicable awards – imposition of penalties pursuant to s178 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) – payment of underpayment pursuant to s178(6) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)– appropriate amount of interest payable pursuant to s179A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss178, 179, 356(b)
Health Services Union of Australia (Private Sector) Interim Award 1993
Health (Residential Care - Victoria) Award 1995
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s51A
Penalty Interest Rates Act 1983 (Vic)
Ardelle v Spastic Society of Victoria [2000] FCA 1429 referred to
Spastic Society of Victoria Ltd v Ardelle [2001] FCA 70 referred to
Batchelor v Burke (1981) 148 CLR 448 applied KIMRAY ARDELLE AND GERALDINE ARDELLE v SPASTIC SOCIETY OF VICTORIA LTD V 507 OF 1999 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE 13 MARCH 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 507 OF 1999
BETWEEN: KIMRAY ARDELLE
FIRST APPLICANT
GERALDINE ARDELLE
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: SPASTIC SOCIETY OF VICTORIA LTD
RESPONDENT JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 MARCH 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to s178(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ("the Act"), a penalty of $200 be imposed on the respondent in respect of the breaches of the Health Services Union of Australia (Private Sector) Interim Award 1993 ("the 1993 Award") identified in the reasons for judgment delivered today and in the reasons delivered on 20 October 2000. 2. Pursuant to s178(1) of the Act, a penalty of $1,800 be imposed on the respondent in respect of the breaches of the Health (Residential Care-Victoria) Award 1995 ("the 1995 Award") identified in the reasons for judgment delivered today and in the reasons delivered on 20 October 2000. 3. Pursuant to s178(6) of the Act, the respondent pay the first applicant the sum of $53,774.58. 4. Pursuant to s178(6) of the Act, the respondent pay the second applicant the sum of $49,576.91. 5. Pursuant to s179A(1) of the Act, the respondent pay interest on each sum referred to in Orders 3 and 4 above at the rate of 6.5% from the date of each underpayment until 20 October 2000. 6. Pursuant to s356(b) of the Act, the respondent pay each applicant the sum of $1,000 in respect of the penalties ordered to be paid by it pursuant to Orders 1 and 2 above. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate