Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority [2001] FCA 236
INDUSTRIAL LAW – contravening conduct - application for orders varying judgment to impose penalty – power of court to so act pursuant to rules – whether change in circumstances sufficient to support exercise of discretion in all the circumstances – effect on discretion of knowledge by applicant for variation of possibility of change PROCEDURE – power to vary orders previously made – whether power extends to permitting new order where change in circumstances on which final orders previously based - effect on discretion of knowledge by applicant for variation of possibility of change Federal Court Rules O 35 r 7, O 36, O 37 r 6 Gamser v Nominal Defendant (1977) 136 CLR 147, applied Gamser v Nominal Defendant [1976] 1 NSWLR 520, referred to Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529, distinguished Permewan Wright Consolidated Pty Ltd v Attorney-General; Ex rel Franklins Stores Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 365, considered Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v Minister for Planning (1994) 84 LGERA 324, referred to QDSV Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1995) 59 FCR 301, referred to Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672, applied State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 28, cited Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 at 265, applied Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1995) 133 ALR 267 at 677, cited Autodesk Inc v Dyason (1993) 176 CLR 300 at 302, applied Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd v Como Investments Pty Ltd (1996) ATPR 41 – 508 at 42362, applied The Texas Company (Australasia) Limited v FCT (1940) 63 CLR 382 at 457, cited Re Pacific Coal Pty Ltd; Ex parte Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2000) 74 ALJR 1034, applied MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA AND PETER WINCH-BUIST, PAUL ARTHUR, CLIVE LAURISTEN, STEVEN PENNEY V GERALDTON PORT AUTHORITY AND ERIC CHARLTON AND MURRAY CRIDDLE WAG 98 and 101 of 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate