Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited v Grosvenor Hill (Queensland) (Formerly Hillier, Parker (Queensland) Pty Limited)
[2001] FCA 237
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Appeal against stay for want of prosecution - consideration of whether stay final or interlocutory - whether exercise of discretion miscarried - demonstrable error - consideration of case management practices. Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 91 Federal Court Rules O4 r 11 O30 r 5 O52 r 10 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (No 1) (1980) 147 CLR 35 Dist Licul v Corney (1976) 180 CLR 213 Appl Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd [No 1] (1981) 147 CLR 246 Appl Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc (No 3) (1998) 86 FCR 374 Cited Weatherall v Satellite Receiving Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd (1999) 92 FCR 101 Cited Hughes v Gales (1995) 14 WAR 434 Appl Hart v Hall & Pickles Ltd [1969] 1 QB 405 Appl Nieman v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431 Appl Birkett v James [1978] AC 297 Appl Madden v Kirkegard Ellwood and Partners [1983] 1 QdR 649 Appl Ex parte Bucknall (1936) 56 CLR 221 Appl Thai v Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 53 FCR 252 Appl Lloyd Werft Bremerhaven GmbH v Owners of Ship "Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya" (1997) 79 FCR 71 Appl
Brisbane South Regional Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Cited
House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Appl
E I Du Pont de Nemours & Co v Commissioner of Patents (1987) 16 FCR 423 Expl
Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Limited (1990) 27 FCR 388 Expl
Hollington v F Hewthorn & Co [1943] 1 KB 587 Appl
Land Securities PLC v Westminster City Council [1993] 1 WLR 286 Appl
Symphony Group plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179 Dist
Murphy v Young & Co's Brewery [1997] 1 WLR 1591 Dist
Reg v Dick [1982] Tas R 252 Cited
THE NATIONAL MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALASIA LIMITED, THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (FORMERLY AETNA LIFE OF AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND LIMITED), THE NATIONAL MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALASIA LIMITED (AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL THOSE PARTIES IDENTIFIED IN ANNEXURE 1 TO THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM FILED 9 JULY 1993), THE NATIONAL MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALASIA LIMITED, THE PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, THE MERCANTILE & GENERAL REINSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED, CYRIL ALAN ROBINSON AND THELMA JEAN ROBINSON, THE NATIONAL MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALASIA LIMITED (AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL THOSE PARTIES IDENTIFIED IN ANNEXURE 2 TO THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM FILED 9 JULY 1993) v GROSVENOR HILL (QUEENSLAND) (FORMERLY HILLIER, PARKER (QUEENSLAND) PTY LIMITED) AND JOHN RICHARDSON Q24 OF 2000 COOPER, WHITLAM AND TAMBERLIN JJ BRISBANE 13 MARCH 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate