Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shahabuddin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 273
MIGRATION – review of RRT decision to affirm Minister's decision not to grant protection visa – whether RRT erred by making decision on basis that there had been valid application before Minister – where applicant failed to complete application form in full – whether substantial compliance with requirement to complete form sufficient to confer validity on application – whether substantial compliance consists of providing information which on fair reading shows claim of refugee status – whether fair reading undertaken in light of Minister's likely background knowledge of applicant's country – whether on such fair reading applicant substantially complied with requirement to complete form – whether substantial compliance requires response to every question on application form – whether response to question can be implied as well as express. Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 481(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 2.07(3) Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Li [2000] FCA 1456 followed Nader v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 101 FCR 352 considered Myint v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 122 referred to Nie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 347 followed Wu v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 64 FCR 245 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v A (1999) 91 FCR 435 referred to Wimalaratne v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 964; [2000] FCA 1737 referred to ALI SHAHABUDDIN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 808 of 2000 KATZ J 23 MARCH 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 808 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate