Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gibbett v Forwood Products Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 290 TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and negligent misrepresentation – applicant purchased wood shavings from first respondent for the purpose of packaging live crayfish – crayfish should not be packaged in wood shavings treated with chemicals – wood shavings treated with chemicals – whether this fact was adequately disclosed – whether representations regarding the amount of the chemical in the wood shavings and its harmful effects were misleading. SALE OF GOODS – whether implied condition that goods would be fit for the purpose was breached – s 14 I of the Sale of Goods Act 1895 (SA) – whether and at what time the applicant relied on respondent's skill and judgment in making representation. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Australia New Zealand Food Authority Act 1991 (Cth) South Australian Timber Corporation Act 1979 (SA) Sale of Goods Act 1895 (SA) s 14 I Fair Trading Act 1987 (SA) s 56 Food Act 1985 (SA) Health (Adoption of Food Standards Code) Regulations 1992 Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited Dependable Motors Pty Ltd v Ashford Shire Council (1959) 101 CLR 265 applied Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 applied Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd [1972] AC 441 applied Cammell Laird & Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze & Brass Co Ltd [1934] AC 402 applied Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1 applied Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 applied World Series Cricket Pty Ltd v Parish (1977) 16 ALR 181 applied Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 cited Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159 cited McInerney v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Ll Rep 246 cited Shaddock & Associates v Parramatta City Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225 cited Holmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692 applied Pennant Hills Restaurants Pty Ltd v Barrell Insurances Pty Ltd (1981) 145 CLR 625 applied The Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 applied Burns v MAN Automotive (Aust) Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 653 cited KENNETH MAXWELL GIBBETT and BRISK SHAVINGS PTY LTD v FORWARD PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 008 089 727) and THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA SG 12 OF 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate