Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Flower & Hart v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 370 INTEREST – interest on costs – exercise of a statutory power to award costs – whether s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) authorizes the award of interest upon costs – whether s 51A of the Act authorizes the award of interest upon an order for costs made pursuant to s 43 of the Act – whether an application pursuant to s 43 is a "cause of action" for the purposes of s 51A – calculation of interest TORTS – abuse of process – whether there is a claim for damages arising from the tort of abuse of process – interest as damages – whether there is a claim for damages for the purposes of s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43, 51A, 52 Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), s 10
Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (in liq) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 224 cited White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Flower & Hart (a firm) (1998) 156 ALR 169 discussed Re Bendeich (No 2) (1994) 53 FCR 422 cited Flower & Hart (a firm) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) 87 FCR 134 cited Commonwealth of Australia v SCI Operations Pty Ltd (1998) 192 CLR 285 distinguished Hanrahan v Ainsworth (1985) 1 NSWLR 370 applied Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Co v Eyre (1883) 11 QBD 674 cited Berry v British Transport Commission [1962] 1 QB 306 cited Coleman v Buckingham's Ltd (1963) 63 SR(NSW) 171 cited QIW Retailers Limited v Felview Pty Ltd [1989] 2 QdR 245 cited Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 considered McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd v Liaweena (NSW) Pty Ltd (1993) 32 NSWLR 190 referred to AWA Limited v Daniels (Rogers J, 19 April 1993, unreported) referred to South Australian Superannuation Fund Investment Trust v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (1996) 66 SASR 509 referred to Nykredit Mortgage Bank PLC v Edward Erdman Group Ltd No 2 [1997] 1 WLR 1627 referred to Hungerfords v Walker (1990) 171 CLR 125 distinguished Andrews v Barnes (1888) 39 ChD 133 referred to Dipple v Dipple [1942] P 65 referred to Re Hawke (Deceased) [1957] NZLR 152 distinguished State of Western Australia v Wardley Australia Ltd (1991) 102 ALR 213 referred to Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 referred to Torrens Aloha Pty Ltd v Citibank NA (1997) 144 ALR 89 referred to Boylan v Farthing (1999) 86 FCR 120 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Langman v Handover (1929) 43 CLR 334 cited Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 cited Sugden v Sugden [1957] P 120 referred to Ingles v Gould [1993] 2 QdR 250 referred to Snell Snell's Equity 29th ed 1990 at p 28 Meagher et al Equity Doctrines and Remedies 3rd ed at p 68 FLOWER & HART (A FIRM) v WHITE INDUSTRIES (QLD) PTY LTD Q 104 OF 2000 DRUMMOND, DOWSETT & HELY JJ 4 APRIL 2001 BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate