Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 390
IMMIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – Applicant found to be member of ISYF and AISSF – whether RRT failed to make material findings of fact – where found that ISYF and AISSF of no interest to authorities – only terrorists and militants are persecuted – whether RRT made finding that ISYF a terrorist or militant organisation – finding implicit in decision – overriding importance of activities of Applicant rather than organisation he is a member thereof – whether activities in Australia gave rise to a sur place claim. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430(1)(c), 430(1)(d), 476(1)(a) and 476(1)(e) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 referred to Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Mohammed (2000) 98 FCR 405 referred to KASHMIR SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1139 OF 2000 CONTI J 6 APRIL 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1139 OF 2000
BETWEEN: KASHMIR SINGH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 APRIL 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Application be dismissed.
2. The Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1139 OF 2000
BETWEEN: KASHMIR SINGH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate