Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Elliott v Nanda & Commonwealth [2001] FCA 418
HUMAN RIGHTS – sex discrimination – sexual harassment – whether sexual harassment may constitute sex discrimination – applicant employed as medical receptionist/secretary at doctor's surgery – claim against doctor HUMAN RIGHTS – sex discrimination – enforcement of determination by Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission ("HREOC") – hearing de novo – whether scope of application to Federal Court is limited by determination of HREOC HUMAN RIGHTS – sex discrimination – employment agency – Commonwealth Employment Service ("CES") – whether CES "permitted" sex discrimination against applicant by doctor – where CES referred applicant to doctor for employment – where CES had earlier received complaints from several women about sexual harassment by doctor at previous surgery HUMAN RIGHTS – sex discrimination – compensation – damages – whether Federal Court bound by quantum of damages awarded by HREOC – aggravated damages – where doctor did not appear at inquiry before HREOC WORDS AND PHRASES – "permit"
Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) ss 5, 14, 22, 26, 28A, 28B, 83A, 105 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO
Commonwealth v Sex Discrimination Commissioner (1998) 90 FCR 179 referred to Flower & Hart (a firm) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) 87 FCR 134 referred to Aldridge v Booth (1988) 80 ALR 1 applied D'Antuono v Minister of Health (1997) 80 FCR 226 referred to O'Callaghan v Loder [1983] 3 NSWLR 89 applied Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd (1988) 20 FCR 217 considered Gilroy v Angelov [2000] FCA 1775 considered Cooper v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 93 FCR 481 considered Adelaide City Corporation v Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd (1928) 40 CLR 481 referred to Evans v Accident Insurance Mutual Holdings Ltd [1998] 2 Qd R 350 referred to Young v Australian Workers' Union (1974) 5 ALR 347 referred to Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563 applied Re Chisum Services Pty Ltd (1982) 7 ACLR 641 referred to Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 133 referred to Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 referred to Coyne v Citizen Finance Limited (1991) 172 CLR 211 referred to Whittle v Paulette (1994) EOC 92-621 referred to Greenhalgh v National Australia Bank Ltd (1997) EOC 92-884 referred to McIntyre v Tully (1999) 90 IR 9 referred to John v M G N Ltd [1997] QB 586 referred to Spautz v Butterworth (1996) 41 NSWLR 1 referred to Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservices Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 referred to LEANNE ELLIOTT v PREM NANDA AND COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA N 720 OF 1999 LEANNE ELLIOTT v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA N 478 OF 2000 MOORE J 11 APRIL 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate