Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sipa Resources Limited v Zinc & Copper Corporation of Australia Ltd [2001] FCA 454
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to strike out paragraphs of cross-claim as pleading evidence and not material facts – particularity required for pleading based on s 51A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Pt V, ss 51A, 52 Federal Court Rules O 11, rr 2, 3
Lord Hanner v Flight (1876) 24 WR 346 referred to Williams v Wilcox (1838) 8 Ad. & E 314 referred to Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-633 considered Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 considered Hunt Contracting Co Pty Ltd v Roebuck Resources NL (1992) 110 ALR 183 considered SIPA RESOURCES LIMITED (ACN 009 053 687) & ANOR v ZINC & COPPER CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 009 254 362) & ORS W 191 OF 2000 LEE J PERTH 24 APRIL 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 191 OF 2000
BETWEEN: SIPA RESOURCES LIMITED
(ACN 009 053 687)
FIRST APPLICANT
ASHLING RESOURCES NL
(ACN 009 282 320)
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: ZINC & COPPER CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA LTD
(ACN 009 254 362)
FIRST RESPONDENT
OUTOKUMPU ZINC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 061 251 223)
SECOND RESPONDENT
AND BY CROSS-CLAIM: ZINC & COPPER CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA LTD
(ACN 009 254 362)
CROSS-CLAIMANT
OUTOKUMPU ZINC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 061 251 223)
FIRST CROSS-RESPONDENT
OUTOKUMPU ZINC COMMERCIAL BV
SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate