Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Xiao v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 459 MIGRATION – review of decision of migration review tribunal – consent order – jurisdiction to remit matter to the tribunal – whether conceded "potential" error of law sufficient for remittal PROCEDURE – consent orders – jurisdiction to remit matter to migration review tribunal – whether concession of "potential" error of law sufficient to found exercise of discretion to order remittal
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116(1)(b), 481(1) Migration Regulations condition 8202 Nong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1575, referred to Kovalev v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 557, considered National Bank of Australasia v Solar (1976) 28 FLR 372, cited Thomson Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150, cited Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia (1999) 161 ALR 79, cited Kapagama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1881, referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (2000) 199 CLR 343, referred to Yulianti v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affair [2001] FCA 142, followed Sanchez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 265, cited Takli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1186, cited SHU BO XIAO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 222 of 2000 RD NICHOLSON J 27 APRIL 2001 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 222 of 2000
BETWEEN: SHU BO XIAO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate