Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harirchi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 474 IMMIGRATION- protection visa - application to review decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal - whether applicant member of a persecuted social group - whether the RRT failed to comply with s430 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by not setting out all its findings on material questions of fact - whether the Tribunal was affected by an adverse view as to the applicant's credibility
WORDS AND PHRASES - "particular social group" Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Part 8, s430 Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 applied
Prahastono v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 77 FCR 260 referred to
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845,(2000) 98 FCR 469 referred to
Najarian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 933, (2000) 175 ALR 695 referred to
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 followed
NADER HARIRCHI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 194 OF 2000 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE (HEARD IN PERTH) 27 APRIL 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 194 OF 2000
BETWEEN: NADER HARIRCHI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 APRIL 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs, if any. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 194 OF 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate