Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Algama v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 476
CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION – review of Tribunal decision affirming decision to refuse a protection visa – post-hearing information and developments – whether Tribunal obliged to invite applicants to present evidence and arguments in respect of post-hearing developments – whether applicants entitled to a "genuine opportunity" to address issues in relation to the review – whether former s 425(1)(a) applies. CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION – apprehended bias – whether refusal to disqualify oneself is a "decision on the review" – whether Tribunal member required to give reasons for refusal to disqualify herself – whether improper exercise of power. CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION – whether Tribunal failed to set out finding on a material question of fact – whether Tribunal failed to set out its reasons for rejecting expert opinion – whether decision based on a fact that did not exist – whether no evidence or other material to justify finding – whether Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the expert opinion – whether constructive failure of jurisdiction. CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION – whether Tribunal applied "What if I am wrong" test. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476(1)(a),(d),(e), (g), 3(b), 4(b), 424, 424A-C, 425, 430(1). Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 8(c), 15AB, 33(1). Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 1999 (Cth), sch 3, s 20. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Cho (1999) 92 FCR 315; [1999] FCA 946, discussed. Muntaser Ibrahim Yousef Sheik Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [2000] FCA 264, discussed. De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 364; [2000] FCA 765, discussed. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Mohammad [2000] FCA 1275, applied. Xiao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1472, applied. Yao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1996) 69 FCR 583, applied. Re: Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57, cited. Jayasinghe v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 76 FCR 301; [1997] FCA 551, applied. Anthonypillai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1368, not followed. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274, applied. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287; [1999] FCA 247, applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559, applied. Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 94 FCR 28; [1998] FCA 1693, discussed. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469; [200] FCA 845, applied. Rajeed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 470, discussed. Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277, discussed. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220; [1999] FCA 794, applied. SABRINA TAMARIS ALGAMA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 400 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate