Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liebach Holdings Pty Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 485
LIEBACH HOLDINGS PTY LTD AND MARK LIEBACH v OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LTD AND OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD V 193 of 2001 GRAY J 11 APRIL 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 193 OF 2001
BETWEEN: LIEBACH HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 081 999 144)
FIRST APPLICANT
MARK LIEBACH
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LTD (ACN 008 570 330)
FIRST RESPONDENT
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD (ACN 054 365 696)
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 APRIL 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for interlocutory relief is dismissed. 2. The proceeding be listed for directions on 23 April 2001. 3. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of today. 4. Otherwise the costs of the application for interlocutory relief be reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 193 OF 2001
BETWEEN: LIEBACH HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 081 999 144)
FIRST APPLICANT
MARK LIEBACH
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LTD (ACN 008 570 330)
FIRST RESPONDENT
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD (ACN 054 365 696)
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAY J
DATE: 11 APRIL 2001
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This application for interlocutory relief arises out of issues as to the franchising by the respondents of their business through retail outlets. The respondents are in the business of providing telephone services, particularly mobile telephone services. Those services, together with the telephones by which they are operated, are generally sold to the public through retail stores. The respondents operate a scheme for franchising those retail stores. 2 The first applicant is a franchisee with respect to a store in Dandenong. The first applicant is a company controlled by the second applicant. What is in one sense a rival franchise is operated at North Dandenong by a company called Digital World Pty Ltd, which is controlled by a Mr Mustica. The first applicant conducts its franchise currently through a five year franchise agreement which commenced to operate on 5 October 2000.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate