Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Don Manuel v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
[2001] FCA 487
MIGRATION – review of RRT decision to affirm Minister's decision to refuse to grant protection visa – written statement of reasons for decision – preparation of statement of reasons – procedures required to be observed in connection with making of decision – required content of statement of reasons – obligation to set out findings on material questions of fact – failure to set out findings regarding documents upon which applicant relied – whether documents material – so-called "what if I am wrong?" test – whether RRT engaged in requisite process of speculation as to likelihood of future persecution.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430, 476(1)(a)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 followed Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 73 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 at 291-293 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred to Muthukuda v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1499 referred to
SHYMAN RANJITH THOTAWATTE DON MANUEL, YAMUNA MALKANTHI PATHIRANAGE and MELANI RAVEENA THOTAWATTE DONA MANUEL and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
V716 of 1999
WEINBERG J
2 MAY 2001
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG716 OF 1999
BETWEEN: SHYMAN RANJITH THOTAWATTE DON MANUEL
FIRST APPLICANT
YAMUNA MALKANTHI PATHIRANAGE
SECOND APPLICANT
MELANI RAVEENA THOTAWATTE DONA MANUEL
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate