Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Saha v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 520
MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision not to grant a protection visa – whether Tribunal committed reviewable error in reaching findings of fact or in observation of procedures required of it or in interpretation or application of law – no reviewable error disclosed
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 424A, 424B, 441A & 476(1) Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 referred to Tharaisara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 520 referred to Pannasara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1331 referred to Nader v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 908 referred to Santa Sabina College v Minister for Education (1985) 58 ALR 527 referred to Carlos v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 301 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Wu Shang Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council [2001] HCA 12 applied TITO KUMAR SAHA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NO. N 58 OF 2001 JUDGE: BEAUMONT J DATE: 27 APRIL 2001 PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 58 OF 2001
BETWEEN: TITO KUMAR SAHA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 APRIL 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed, with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate