Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Soboleva v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 528
migration law – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – applicants allege Tribunal's findings inconsistent with findings in earlier decisions – whether Tribunal bound to follow earlier decisions – whether Tribunal bound to address alleged inconsistency in its reasons for decision – when a party refers to and relies on findings in a previous decision. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430 & 476 Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 351 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000)98 FCR 469 Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287 cited Witharana v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (Unreported, Federal Court, Wilcox J, 21 December 1998) cited SOBOLEVA & ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1205 of 2000 MOORE J 8 MAY 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1205 OF 2000
BETWEEN: TATIANA SOBOLEVA
FIRST APPLICANT
SERGUEI SOBOLEV
SECOND APPLICANT
VADIM SOBOLEV
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1205 OF 2000
BETWEEN: TATIANA SOBOLEVA
FIRST APPLICANT
SERGUEI SOBOLEV
SECOND APPLICANT
VADIM SOBOLEV
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate