Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Endormer Pty Limited (in liq) v Australian Guarantee Corporation Limited [2001] FCA 548 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs of appeal. ENDORMER PTY LIMITED (in liq) & ORS v AUSTRALIAN GUARANTEE CORPORATION LIMITED & ANOR N 1354 OF 2000 LEE, FINN & CONTI JJ HEARD IN SYDNEY (BY VIDEO-LINK WITH PERTH AND CANBERRA) 24 APRIL 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1354 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ENDORMER PTY LIMITED (in liq)
FIRST APPELLANT
KWIKDAY PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPELLANT
GLENN ROBERT JARRETT
THIRD APPELLANT
DAVID COLIN PATERSON
FOURTH APPELLANT
JARRETT HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
FIFTH APPELLANT
ALINBOW PTY LIMITED
SIXTH APPELLANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN GUARANTEE CORPORATION LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
PETER JAMES HEDGE
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: LEE, FINN & CONTI JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 24 APRIL 2001
WHERE MADE: HEARD IN SYDNEY
(BY VIDEO-LINK WITH PERTH AND CANBERRA)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The motion be dismissed and the costs of the motion be reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1354 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ENDORMER PTY LIMITED (in liq)
FIRST APPELLANT
KWIKDAY PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPELLANT
GLENN ROBERT JARRETT
THIRD APPELLANT
DAVID COLIN PATERSON
FOURTH APPELLANT
JARRETT HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
FIFTH APPELLANT
ALINBOW PTY LIMITED
SIXTH APPELLANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN GUARANTEE CORPORATION LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate