Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pitman v Pantzer (Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Thomas Richard Wenkart) [2001] FCA 558
BANKRUPTCY – proof of debt – where issue raised of whether there is a material distinction between the position of a creditor in terms of creditor's right to vote as against admission to proof for all purposes – not deciding – order for separate determination of question rescinded in circumstances ALAN PITMAN V WARREN PANTZER (TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF THOMAS RICHARD WENKART) N7752 OF 2000
BEAUMONT ACJ SYDNEY 4 MAY 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7752 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ALAN PITMAN
APPLICANT
AND: WARREN PANTZER (TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS RICHARD WENKART)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT ACJ
DATE OF ORDER: 4 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Rescind the consent order dated 23 February 2001 for the determination of the separate questions there stated. 2. Direct that the intervening creditors file and serve points of defence on or before 25 May 2001. 3. Direct that the applicant file and serve any points in reply on or before 1 June 2001. 4. Fix the final hearing of the claim made in paragraph 1 of the further amended application dated 7 February 2001, to commence on a date in June to be arranged with my associate, being a date not later than 12 June 2001. 5. All costs are reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7752 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ALAN PITMAN
APPLICANT
AND: WARREN PANTZER (TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS RICHARD WENKART)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BEAUMONT ACJ
DATE: 4 MAY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate