Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taubert v Eddaglide Pty Ltd
[2001] FCA 567
BANKRUPTCY – application to set aside summary judgment forming basis of bankruptcy notice – whether appropriate to go behind summary judgment – where debtor granted extension of time for compliance to enable judgment to be set aside in appropriate court – failure by applicant to set aside judgment – relevance of cross-claim set-off or cross demand less than judgment debt by applicant – where principal liability conceded in related proceedings – whether judgment "final judgment" under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – effect of Mareva order obtained by creditor Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 40(1), 40(3), 41(1), 41(3), 41(5), 41(6), 41(6A), 41(6C), 41(7), 86 Corporations Laws 553C Olivieri v Stafford (1989) 24 FCR 413 referred to Malouf v Malouf (1999) 86 FCR 134 referred to Boscolo v Botany Council, (Jenkinson, O'Loughlin & Sackville JJ, 16 October 1996, unreported) referred to Wiltshire-Smith v Olsson (1995) 57 FCR 572 referred to Byron v Southern Star Group Pty Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 264 referred to
SIGMUND TAUBERT v EDDAGLIDE PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 051 149 596 and GUNDAGAI GOLD PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 002 862 615 IN THE MATTER OF SIGMUND TAUBERT
N 7748 OF 2000
GYLES J
SYDNEY
17 MAY 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7748 OF 2000
IN THE MATTER OF SIGMUND TAUBERT
BETWEEN: SIGMUND TAUBERT
APPLICANT
AND: EDDAGLIDE PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
ACN 051 149 596
FIRST RESPONDENT
GUNDAGAI GOLD PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
ACN 002 862 615
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GYLES J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Application dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondents, including all costs reserved in the proceedings up to and including the date of judgment. 3. The time for compliance with bankruptcy notices NN5404 of 2000 and NN5405 of 2000 be extended until 1 June 2001. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate