Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bayliss v Australian Capital Territory Chief Minister's Department [2001] FCA 576
ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRÉ SEBASTIAN BAYLISS v AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY CHIEF MINISTER'S DEPARTMENT & ORS A 19 of 2000
ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRÉ SEBASTIAN BAILIFF v AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE & ORS A 77 of 2000 WHITLAM, MADGWICK & KENNY JJ 15 MAY 2001 CANBERRA
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY A 19 of 2000
BETWEEN: ALEXANDER MARCEL ANDRÉ SEBASTIAN BAYLISS
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY CHIEF MINISTER'S DEPARTMENT
First respondent
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY URBAN SERVICES
Second Respondent
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY STANDING COMMITTEE URBAN SERVICES
Third Respondent
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY PLANNING AND LAND MANAGEMENT
Fourth Respondent
COMMUNITY HOUSING CANBERRA LTD ACN 081 354 752
Fifth Respondent
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HOUSING
Sixth Respondent
NATIONAL ROADS AND MOTORISTS ASSOCIATION ACN 000 016 722
Seventh Respondent
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ELECTRICITY AND WATER LIMITED
Eighth Respondent
AUSTRALIAN GAS LIGHT COMPANY LIMITED ARBN 052 167 405
Ninth Respondent
ECOWISE SERVICES (AUST) PTY LTD ACN 083 075 030
Tenth Respondent
CANBERRA INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ACN 003 157 515
Eleventh Respondent
THE COX GROUP ACN 002 535 891
Twelfth Respondent
PURDON ASSOCIATES PTY LTD ACN 008 610 080
Thirteenth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate