Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schanka v Employment National (Administration) Pty Limited [2001] FCA 579
INDUSTRIAL LAW – representative proceeding – Australian Workplace Agreements ("AWAs") – duress – illegitimate pressure – abolition of Commonwealth Employment Service ("CES") – creation of competitive market for provision of employment placement services – offer of employment to employees of CES by company formed by Commonwealth to participate in employment placement services market – offer conditional on entry into AWA WORDS AND PHRASES – "duress"
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 170WG(1) Public Service Act 1922 (Cth) s 81C
Schanka v Employment National (Administration) Pty Ltd (1999) 166 ALR 663 followed Schanka v Employment National (Administration) Pty Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 186 followed Maritime Union of Australia v Burnie Port Corporation Pty Ltd (2000) 101 IR 435 distinguished PETER SCHANKA, ERICA ALDRIDGE, RICHARD WALDEN AND JAMES BURNS v EMPLOYMENT NATIONAL (ADMINISTRATION) PTY LIMITED (ACN 080 046 411) NG 461 OF 1998 MOORE J 18 MAY 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 461 OF 1998
BETWEEN: PETER SCHANKA
FIRST APPLICANT
ERICA ALDRIDGE
SECOND APPLICANT
RICHARD WALDEN
THIRD APPLICANT
JAMES BURNS
FOURTH APPLICANT
AND: EMPLOYMENT NATIONAL (ADMINISTRATION) PTY LIMITED (ACN 080 046 411)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The parties prepare and serve short minutes of orders to give effect to these reasons within seven days. 2. The application be stood over until 9.00am Friday 1 June 2001 or such other time as the Court may direct. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate