Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Madafferi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 581
IMMIGRATION – Spouse visa – Decision of the AAT – Decision of the Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs – Whether Minister's decision involved an error of law – Whether the Minister observed procedures required by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Whether Minister's decision involved an improper exercise of power – Whether the Minister's decision involved actual bias – Whether the Minister's decision was based on no evidence Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Pt 8, ss 499, 501, 501A
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
Migration Regulations 1993 (Cth) Sched 4
Lam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1226 followed
Lau v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 698 at [29]applied
Aksu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 514 at [10] and [34]discussed
Damanik v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 771 at [10] followed
Tuli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 271, 94 FCR 526 at [277] followed
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 at [38] applied
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 applied
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 at 272 applied
FRANCESCO MADAFFERI v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V839 OF 2000 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE 18 MAY 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V839 OF 2000
BETWEEN: FRANCESCO MADAFFERI
APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate