Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dickson v Whiddett [2001] FCA 585
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW –review of decision to end fixed-term appointment of member of Australian Federal Police early – internal submission provided to decision-maker – no statement by decision-maker of reasons for decision – whether failure to take into account relevant considerations – alleged errors and omissions in submission – whether applicant could establish particular findings were made – whether irrelevant considerations taken into account – no evidence – alleged non existence of certain facts referred to in submission – unreasonableness – alleged perverse finding of fact in submission – procedural fairness – failure to disclose to applicant adverse allegations contained in submission – error of law ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – remedy for breach of natural justice when applicant's fixed term of employment expired STATUTE - repeal of Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (Cth) s 26E(3) – prior to repeal, appointment could not be terminated "merely because" of certain acts or omissions – whether applicant had an accrued right within the meaning of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 8(c) - meaning of "merely because" PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time in which to apply for judicial review – reasons for delay
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5, s 11(1)(c), s 13(8), Schedule 2, item (za) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (Cth), s 26E Australian Federal Police Amendment Act 1996 (Cth), Schedule 1, item 5 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 8(c)
Wedesweiller v Cole (1983) 47 ALR 528 referred Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 followed Comcare v A'Hearn (1993) 45 FCR 441 followed Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 followed Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 referred Robertson v City of Nunawading [1973] VR 819 referred Ellis v Minister for Lands (1985) 37 NTR 29 considered La Macchia v Minister for Primary Industry (1986) 72 ALR 23 considered Esber v The Commonwealth of Australia (1992) 174 CLR 430 referred Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 referred Curragh Queensland Mining Limited v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 referred Detsongjarus v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 21 ALD 139 referred Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 followed McLachlan v Australian Securities and Investment Commission (1999) 85 FCR 286 referred Ozmanian v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996)137 ALR 103 referred Telstra Corporation Limited v Kendall (1995) 55 FCR 221 referred McVeigh v Willarra Pty Ltd (1984) 6 FCR 587 referred Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322 referred Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte AALA (2000) 176 ALR 219 referred Perder Investments Pty Ltd v Elmer (1991) 31 FCR 201 referred Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 considered Bradley v Attorney-General [1988] 2 NZLR 454 referred
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate