Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Williams v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 601
administRative law – Veterans' entitlements – Application for widow's pension – Veteran died of coronary atherosclerosis – Veteran commenced to smoke during war-service – Issue before Administrative Appeals Tribunal as to whether veteran's death resulted from smoking – Repatriation Medical Authority had issued two Statements of Principles concerning ischaemic heart disease: SoP 80 of 1998, in force at date of veteran's death and initial decision refusing application for pension, and SoP 38 of 1999, in force at date of Tribunal decision – Tribunal rejected applicant's appeal, relying on SoP 80 of 1998 – Whether applicant entitled to rely on SoP 38 of 1999 – Whether Tribunal erred in its interpretation of SoP 80 of 1998 – Whether Tribunal's methodology conformed with the requirements of s 120 of Veterans' Entitlements Act. Gorton v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 286 followed. Repatriation Commission v Keeley (2000) 78 FCR 108 distinguished Repatriation Commission v Thomson [2001] FCA 311 discussed Costello v The Secretary, Department of Transport (1979) 2 ALD 934 applied Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986: ss 120, 120A, 196B JOAN MARY WILLIAMS v REPATRIATION COMMISSION N39 of 2001 WILCOX J 25 MAY 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY N39 of 2001
ON APPEAL FROM THE VETERAN'S DIVISION
OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: JOAN MARY WILLIAMS
APPELLANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Veterans' Appeal Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal dated 15 December 2000 be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Veterans' Appeals Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for further hearing (with or without further evidence, as the Tribunal may decide) and determination according to law. 3. The respondent, Repatriation Commission, pay the costs of the applicant, Joan Mary Williams, incurred in connection with this proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate