Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gabelish v Comcare [2001] FCA 618 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal – compensation for government employee – whether tribunal in error of law – whether tribunal took into account irrelevant consideration – whether tribunal failed to take into account a relevant consideration – whether tribunal failed to consider whether evidence of a contributing factor or contributing factor to a material degree – relevance of findings of no causal connection WORKERS COMPENSATION – government employee – whether tribunal in error of law in not considering whether evidence established a contributing factor or a contributing factor to a material degree Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 s 44(1) Treloar v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1990) 97 ALR 321, applied Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54, cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond & Ors (1990) 170 CLR 321, referred to Reg v District Court; Ex parte White (1966) 116 CLR 644, cited ANTHONY JOHN GABELISH v COMCARE W 151 of 2000 RD NICHOLSON J 29 MAY 2001 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 151 of 2000
BETWEEN: ANTHONY JOHN GABELISH
APPLICANT
AND: COMCARE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 MAY 2001
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application by way of appeal be dismissed 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 151 of 2000
BETWEEN: ANTHONY JOHN GABELISH
APPLICANT
AND: COMCARE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE: 29 MAY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate