Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
A.C.N. 002 023 609 Pty Limited v Meware Pty Limited
[2001] FCA 650
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – whether Court should exercise power to order security under Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56(1) – where power discretionary – whether relevant consideration ability of corporate applicant to pay respondents' costs should applicant's claim fail – whether relevant consideration making of order for security effectively terminating litigation because of applicant's impecuniosity – whether, when applicant incorporated, impecuniosity to be so considered that of corporate applicant or persons standing behind it – whether burden of persuasion on question of impecuniosity of persons standing behind corporate applicant carried by party seeking or party resisting order for security – whether relevant consideration alleged wrongdoing of respondent said to have brought about applicant's impecuniosity – where applicant incorporated and persons standing behind it themselves not shown to be impecunious – whether relevant consideration strength of applicant's case – whether relevant consideration "public interest" element to litigation – quantum of security. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56(1) Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 followed Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) ATPR 40-972 referred to
A.C.N. 002 023 609 PTY LIMITED v MEWARE PTY LIMITED & ORS N 1147 of 2000 KATZ J SYDNEY 1 JUNE 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1147 of 2000
BETWEEN: A.C.N. 002 023 609 PTY LIMITED
(ACN 002 023 609)
APPLICANT
AND: MEWARE PTY LIMITED
(ACN 080 551 293)
FIRST RESPONDENT
WILLIAM KEEN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate