Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pollocks v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 689 MIGRATION – refugee – protection visa – where Tribunal rejected certain of appellants' claims as "implausible" – whether Tribunal failed to refer to evidence or other material on which it based findings of fact – whether Tribunal failed to "consider" application.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth): s 430(1)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 applied MICHAEL ANGELO POLLOCKS, CATHERINE POLLOCKS, CHRISTINA POLLOCKS, MARK POLLOCKS & MYLES POLLOCKS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 898 OF 2000 MOORE, TAMBERLIN AND GOLDBERG JJ 4 JULY 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 898 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MICHAEL ANGELO POLLOCKS, CATHERINE POLLOCKS, CHRISTINA POLLOCKS, MARK POLLOCKS & MYLES POLLOCKS
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MOORE, TAMBERLIN AND GOLDBERG JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 4 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The appellants pay the respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 898 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MICHAEL ANGELO POLLOCKS, CATHERINE POLLOCKS, CHRISTINA POLLOCKS, MARK POLLOCKS & MYLES POLLOCKS
APPELLANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: MOORE, TAMBERLIN AND GOLDBERG JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate