Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Visvalingam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 696
IMMIGRATION – Application for Refugee status – whether failure of RRT to consider all of the substantial claims – RRT correctly identified nature of Applicant's claim – findings on credibility – RRT did not accept the applicant's evidence – RRT's reasons to be read beneficially – whether being a Tamil per se gives rise to a well-founded fear of persecution – whether incorrect to contend that Applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution independently of his personal claims – impact of High Court decision in Yusuf on Full Federal Court's decision in Sellamuthu. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430(1)(c), 476(1)(a), 476(1)(b), 476(1)(c) and 476(1)(e) Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied Vichlenkova v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] 1338 referred to Mwakaya v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1637 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 referred to W168/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 538 applied Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287 dist Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 applied Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to BALALINGAM APPAKUTTI VISVALINGAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 23 of 2001
CONTI J 8 JUNE 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 23 OF 2001
BETWEEN: BALALINGAM APPAKUTTI VISVALINGAM
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate