Mundraby v Commonwealth of Australia [2001] FCA 775
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mundraby v Commonwealth of Australia [2001] FCA 775
ELLIS MUNDRABY v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
NG 808 OF 1998
AND
DAVID MARK LEWIS v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
NG 809 OF 1998
TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
20 JUNE 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 808 OF 1998
BETWEEN: ELLIS MUNDRABY
APPLICANT
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
NG 809 of 1998
BETWEEN: DAVID MARK LEWIS
APPLICANT
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 20 JUNE 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 In this matter a challenge has been made to the expertise of Mr Drummond who has been called to give evidence as to the Royal Australian Navy's career progression assessment of the applicant. Having heard cross‑examination, considered Mr Drummond's curriculum vitae and heard evidence from Mr Drummond, I am not satisfied that he has the necessary expertise by way of study, training or experience to express an opinion that would qualify as an expert opinion to the court. Accordingly, I do not accept Mr Drummond as being an expert in the areas which are referred to in his reports and which are the subjects of the conclusions which he expresses.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.
Associate:
Dated: 25 June 2001
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D T Kennedy SC
Mr E G Romaniuk
Mr A C M Iuliano
Solicitor for the Applicant: William Szekely
Szekely & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C C Branson QC
Mr P S Jones
Ms S Thode
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 20 June 2001
Date of Judgment: 20 June 2001
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.