Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Silveira v Australian Institute of Management [2001] FCA 803 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – applicant refused Skilled – Independent visa – where sub-clause 136 of Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations 1994 lay down requirements for visa – where item 1128C(3)(c) of Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations 1994 provides that an application for Skilled – Independent visa must be accompanied by satisfactory evidence that relevant assessing authority has assessed skills of applicant nominated skilled occupation – where respondent was relevant assessing authority – where respondent assessed applicant's skills as not meeting required standard – whether Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal of decision – whether decision made "under an enactment" – whether decision an ultimate determination – whether respondent misconceived its function Islam v The Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1183 distinguished Edelsten v Health Insurance Commission (1990) 27 FCR 56 followed Chapmans Ltd v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 402 followed Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Mayer (1985) 157 CLR 290 distinguished Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 followed New England Biolabs Inc v Commissioner of Patents & Anor [2001] FCA 787 cited Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 31, 45, 46, 47, 65, 93 Migration Regulations 1994, 2.01, 2.02, 2.26A, Item 1128C (Schedule 1), Sub-clause 136 (Schedule 2) NICHOLA SILVEIRA v AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT N 1299 OF 2000 EMMETT J 27 JUNE 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1299 OF 2000
BETWEEN: NICHOLA SILVEIRA
APPLICANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate