Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Balderrama v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2001] FCA 821 FRANCISCO JAVIER RIOS BALDERRAMA & ANOR v COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE & ORS
N383 OF 2001 EMMETT J 8 JUNE 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 383 OF 2001
BETWEEN: FRANCISCO JAVIER RIOS BALDERRAMA
FIRST APPLICANT
EDUARDO ARMANDO GARCIA QUIROZ
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
FIRST RESPONDENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECOND RESPONDENT
MAGISTRATE LESLIE BRENNAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY GENERAL
FIFTH RESPONDENT
COMMISSIONER FOR CORRECTIVE SERVICES
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings including the costs of today. 3. Order 1. be stayed up to and including 24 July 2001.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 383 OF 2001
BETWEEN: FRANCISCO JAVIER RIOS BALDERRAMA
FIRST APPLICANT
EDUARDO ARMANDO GARCIA QUIROZ
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
FIRST RESPONDENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECOND RESPONDENT
MAGISTRATE LESLIE BRENNAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY GENERAL
FIFTH RESPONDENT
COMMISSIONER FOR CORRECTIVE SERVICES
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate