Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Ltd v News Limited [2001] FCA 862 TRADE PRACTICES – exclusionary provision – rival rugby league competitions with total of 20 teams – agreement in 1997 for uniform competition which by 2000 would consist of 14 teams – agreement that criteria would be developed to determine which clubs, if any, were to be excluded – criteria applied in October 1999 with appellant being excluded from 2000 competition – whether proscribed exclusionary purpose established – whether a "particular class of persons" can be defined in part by fact of exclusion – whether restricting number of persons to or from whom services are supplied or acquired constitutes "restricting or limiting" supply or acquisition of services – whether parties to an exclusionary provision must be competitive with each other at time provision takes effect – discretion to grant injunction – likelihood of threatened conduct occurring – whether damages an adequate remedy. WORDS OR PHRASES – "particular persons", "particular class", "purpose", "restricting or limiting". Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4D,4F, 45(2)(a)(i), 45(2)(b)(i), 80(4), 82 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 29(b) News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd (1996) 58 FCR 447 mentioned News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd (1996) 64 FCR 410 mentioned South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Ltd v News Ltd (1999) 169 ALR 120 mentioned South Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Ltd v News Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 611 considered ASX Operations Pty Ltd v Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd (No 1) (1990) 27 FCR 460 applied Rutman Wine Co v E & J Gallo Winery 82 F2d 729 (1987) at 735 mentioned Newton v Commissioner of Taxation [1958] AC 450 at 465 mentioned Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (1986) 19 FCR 10 at 37-38 mentioned Wribrass Pty Ltd v Swallow (1979) 38 FLR 92 at 102 mentioned Industrial Enterprises Ltd v Federated Storemen and Packers' Union of Australia (1979) ATPR 40-100 mentioned Tillmans Butcheries Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (1979) 42 FLR 331 at 338 and 351 mentioned Transport Workers Union of Australia v Leon Laidely Pty Ltd (1980) 43 FLR 168 mentioned Jewel Food Stores Pty Ltd v Amalgamated Milk Vendors Association Inc (1989) 24 FCR 127 at 133-135 considered Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 discussed Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1994) 47 FCR 300 at 304-305 mentioned Eastern Express Pty Ltd v General Newspapers Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 385 at 420 mentioned Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v Williams & Hodgson Transport Pty Ltd (1985) 7 FCR 432 at 531-532 mentioned Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Visy Paper Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 240 mentioned Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd v Debelak (1989) 89 ALR 275 at 318 mentioned Health Services for Men Pty Ltd v D'Souza (2000) 48 NSWLR 448 at 461 mentioned ICI Australian Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 at 256-257 mentioned Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd (2001) 178 ALR 253 at [60] mentioned Gallagher v Pioneer Concrete (NSW) Pty Ltd (1993) 113 ALR 159 mentioned Bullock v Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (1985) 5 FCR 464 mentioned Trade Practices Commission v TNT Management Pty Ltd (1985) 6 FCR 1 mentioned Devenish v Jewel Food Stores Pty Ltd (1991) 172 CLR 32 mentioned Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 470 mentioned Trade Practices Commission v The Gillette Company (1993) 45 FCR 366 mentioned. SOUTH SYDNEY DISTICT RUGBY LEAGUE FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITED v NEWS LIMITED & ORS N 1264 OF 2000 HEEREY, MOORE & MERKEL JJ 6 JULY 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate