Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
W63 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 890
MIGRATION – refugee – refusal of protection visa – Refugee Review Tribunal – alleged adversarial conduct of hearing by Tribunal – inquisitorial process – alleged pre-disposition of Tribunal to disbelieve Iran asylum seekers illegally in Australia – - irrelevance of national, racial or ethnic origin – irrelevance of illegal entry – approach to credibility – questionable identification of alleged inconsistencies in applicant's case – whether no evidence ground applicable - whether Tribunal properly applied real chance test – whether Tribunal had duty to inquire further before rejecting documentary evidence Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424, s 476 Refugee Convention Article 1A(2)
Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 cited Chand v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (unrep, Full Court, 7/11/1997) cited Attorney-General (NSW) v Quinn (1990) 170 CLR 1 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al-Miahi [2001] FCA 744 cited
W63 v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W63 OF 2001 FRENCH J 11 JULY 2001 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W63 OF 2001
BETWEEN: W63
APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 JULY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate