Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc v Bradley [2001] FCA 908
CONTEMPT OF COURT – Statements made by Chief Minister and Attorney-General at a press conference – Alleged abuse of party to litigation and subjection of that party to improper pressure to discontinue or compromise the proceeding – Alleged dissuasion of potential witnesses – Applicable legal principles – Applicability of the principle subordinating prejudice in litigation to public interest in discussion of public affairs – Analysis of statements made at press conference – Contempt of court found established – Discussion regarding appropriate orders for penalty and costs. Harkianakis v Skalkos [1997] 42 NSWLR 22 applied. Ex parte Bread Manufacturers Ltd; Re Truth and Sportsman Ltd (1937) 37 SR(NSW) 242 distinguished. Director of Public Prosecutions v Wran (1986) 7 NSWLR 616 referred to. Willshire Smith v Votino Brothers Pty Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 496 referred to. NORTH AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE INC v HUGH BURTON BRADLEY and NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA D 17 of 2001 WILCOX J 24 JULY 2001 DARWIN
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY D 17 of 2001
DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: NORTH AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE INC
APPLICANT
AND: HUGH BURTON BRADLEY
FIRST RESPONDENT
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: DARWIN
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. It be adjudged and declared that Denis Burke, Chief Minister and Attorney-General of the Northern Territory of Australia, is guilty of contempt of court in relation to statements made by him during the course of a press conference held on 7 June 2001 at Darwin. 2. Within one month from the date of this order, the said Denis Burke pay to the Registrar of the Court the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) by way of penalty for the said contempt. 3. The said Denis Burke pay to the applicant, North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc, the costs incurred by the said applicant in relation to the notice of motion dated 12 June 2001 alleging contempt of court, except for costs incurred in connection with the adjourned hearing on 15 June 2001. 4. The said applicant pay to the said Denis Burke the costs incurred by him in relation to the adjourned hearing on 15 June 2001. 5. The costs payable under orders 3 and 4 be assessed or taxed on the basis that they are to include all costs incurred by the party entitled except insofar as they are of an unreasonable amount or were unreasonably incurred so that, subject to such exceptions, the party entitled will be completely indemnified for its or his costs by the party bound by the order. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate