Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Grahame v Lang Corporation Limited [2001] FCA 916
ANTHONY WAYNE GRAHAME v LANG CORPORATION LIMITED, CHRISTOPHER D'ARCY CORRIGAN, PCS OPERATIONS PTY LTD, PSC RESOURCES PTY LTD, P AND C STEVEDORES PTY LTD, DONALD GORDON McGAUCHIE, PAUL XAVIER HOULIHAN and JAMES WILLIAM FERGUSON
Q132 of 2000
KIEFEL J
16 JULY 2001
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q132 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ANTHONY WAYNE GRAHAME
APPLICANT
AND: LANG CORPORATION LIMITED
(ACN 008 660 124)
FIRST RESPONDENT
CHRISTOPHER D'ARCY CORRIGAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
PCS OPERATIONS PTY LTD
(ACN 081 231 049)
THIRD RESPONDENT
PSC RESOURCES PTY LTD
(ACN 081 231 021)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
P AND C STEVEDORES PTY LTD
(ACN 081 225 078)
FIFTH RESPONDENT
DONALD GORDON McGAUCHIE
SIXTH RESPONDENT
PAUL XAVIER HOULIHAN
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JAMES WILLIAM FERGUSON
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Notice of Motion brought by the third to eighth respondents (the PCS respondents) is dismissed. 2. The PCS respondents are to pay applicant's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q132 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ANTHONY WAYNE GRAHAME
APPLICANT
AND: LANG CORPORATION LIMITED
(ACN 008 660 124)
FIRST RESPONDENT
CHRISTOPHER D'ARCY CORRIGAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate