Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 929

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 929 IMMIGRATION – whether error of law by Refugee Review Tribunal – whether fresh arguments should be permitted Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 430(1), 476(1)(a), 476(1)(b), 476(1)(c), 476(1)(e) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Duraraijasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 referred to H v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1348 referred to Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 referred to Sidhu v Holmes [2000] FCA 1653 referred to Wimalaratne v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1737 referred to Wu Shan Liang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 175 ALR 585 referred to Perampalam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred to Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1567 referred to RAVISHANKER PATHMANATHAN IYER v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1263 OF 2000 HEEREY, MANSFIELD AND GYLES JJ SYDNEY 20 JULY 2001

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1263 OF 2000

BETWEEN: RAVISHANKER PATHMANATHAN IYER

APPELLANT

AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

JUDGE: HEEREY, MANSFIELD AND GYLES JJ

DATE OF ORDER: 20 JULY 2001

WHERE MADE: SYDNEY