Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Smith v State Bank of NSW Limited [2001] FCA 946
TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – bank issued certificate of accreditation to accountant – certificate represented accountant had been assessed by bank for competency and was competent to provide professional advice – accountant an undischarged bankrupt with convictions for fraud – whether representation misleading or deceptive – applicants invested funds in company controlled by accountant – investment a sham – whether representation caused loss – whether a substantial consideration or real inducement NEGLIGENCE – negligent misstatement – economic loss – bank issued certificate representing that accountant had been assessed for competency and was competent to provide professional advice – accountant an undischarged bankrupt with convictions for fraud – applicants relied on representation in certificate – invested funds in company controlled by accountant – investment a sham – whether bank owed applicants a duty of care – bank realised customers of accountant would act in reliance on representation in connection with matter of business or serious consequence – whether reliance reasonable – whether breach of duty – whether bank took reasonable steps to ensure representations in certificate were accurate
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53, 82
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191, applied Ricochet Pty Ltd v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Company Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 229, applied Como Investments Pty Ltd (In liquidation) v Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41-550, applied Neilsen v Hempston Holdings Pty Ltd (1986) 65 ALR 302, cited Sutton v A J Thompson Pty Ltd (in liq) (1987) 73 ALR 233, cited Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (No 1) (1988) 39 FCR 546, cited Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board [2001] HCA 19; (2000) 75 ALJR 775, applied TERENCE SPENCER SMITH AND SUSAN JOAN SMITH v STATE BANK OF NSW LIMITED V 473 of 2000 GRAY J 20 JULY 2001 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate