Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 955 MIGRATION – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") – whether the Tribunal, in failing to refer to one of the applicants' claims, constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction or erred in law – whether the Tribunal failed to address the question of whether the applicants would be 'persecuted' on returning to Iran – whether there was no evidence to justify the Tribunal's decision – whether the applicant has identified a 'particular fact' on which the Tribunal's decision was based
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(b), s 476(1)(c), s 476(1)(e), s 476(1)(g), s 476(4)(b)
Z v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 51 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 considered Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 followed Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 at 258 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 at 272 followed Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status 1979 ABC & ANOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 220 of 2001 STONE J 20 JULY 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 220 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ABC
FIRST APPLICANT
DEF
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate