Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Silva v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 962
MIGRATION – Bridging visa – Mandatory condition of the visa that the visa holder is not to work in Australia – decision that a $50,000 security be lodged – consideration of the relevant statutory regime Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2, cl 050.612A O'Reilly v The Commissioner of the State Bank of Victoria (1983) 153 CLR 1 - cited PRIYANKARAGE UPUL DE SILVA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS MERKEL J 23 JULY 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 684 OF 2001
BETWEEN: PRIYANKARAGE UPUL DE SILVA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decisions of the Migrations Review Tribunal made on 19 June 2001 affirming the decision under review to refuse the grant of a Bridging E (Class WE) visa, subclass 050 to the Applicant and affirming the decision under review to require a security of $50,000 for compliance with conditions if a subclass 050 visa were granted, be set aside; 2. The matters the subject of those decisions be remitted to the Migration Review Tribunal, differently constituted, for reconsideration according to law. 3. The Respondent pay the Applicant's costs as agreed or taxed in default of agreement.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 684 OF 2001
BETWEEN: PRIYANKARAGE UPUL DE SILVA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MERKEL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate