Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Salehi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 995 MIGRATION - Application to review decision of Refugee Review Tribunal - application lodged outside 28 day period - notice of objection to competency - applicant in immigration detention - applicant had difficulty obtaining form for an application for review from respondent's officers despite requests - applicant gave completed application to respondent's officers to lodge with Court by facsimile within 28 day period prescribed under s 478(1)(b) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - application lodged with Court after 28 day period had elapsed - delay due to administrative error - whether s 478 creates a jurisdictional bar - whether s 478(2) should be construed as subject to certain exception.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte HB [2001] HCA 34 applied Hocine v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 99 FCR 269 applied Oguzhan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 99 FCR 285 applied Nirmalan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 562 applied Quevedo-Navarro v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 83 applied Pannasara v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 213 applied H v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 43 applied Al Achrafi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 46 ALD 550 referred to Ayub v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1844 considered Al Adwan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 706 referred to Kucuk v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 535 applied Gamage v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1223 referred to Takli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1186 referred to Savouts v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1059 referred to Radhi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 777 referred to Duwai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1309 applied Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 58 ALD 680 referred to Susiatin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 83 FCR 574 referred to Long v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 65 FCR 164 applied Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 386 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Polat (1995) 57 FCR 98 applied Formosa v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 46 FCR 117 applied Hong v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 82 FCR 468 applied Guendouz v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 766 considered Bariah v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] 1253 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ozmanian (1996) 71 FCR 1 applied Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1981) 147 CLR 297 referred to MacAlister v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 324 referred to Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 considered Le v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 53 FCR 27 considered Brehoi v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 1747 referred to Al Adwan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 706 applied Barzideh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 72 FCR 337 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 considered ALI SALEHI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S138 OF 2000 MANSFIELD J ADELAIDE (HEARD IN PORT HEDLAND) 1 AUGUST 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate