Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Abel v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1010
MIGRATION – refugee - application for judicial review of a Refugee Review Tribunal decision – allegation that Tribunal failed to consider applicant's case on the basis of his membership of a particular group – claim of membership of a group not made before the Tribunal – finding by Tribunal that applicant's association with Tamils would not attract persecution– no reviewable error of law – application dismissed.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Hanna v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1413 Hanna v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 63 Gnanasambanther v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 693 IVAN KINGSLEY ABEL, JANAKI ABEL, KOKILA ABEL AND JANENE ABEL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 76 of 2001 MOORE J 1 AUGUST 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 76 OF 2001
BETWEEN: IVAN KINGSLEY ABEL, JANAKI ABEL, KOKILA ABEL AND JANENE ABEL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 76 OF 2001
BETWEEN: IVAN KINGSLEY ABEL, JANAKI ABEL, KOKILA ABEL AND JANENE ABEL
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 1 AUGUST 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate