Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vargas v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1025
MIGRATION – protection visa – review of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing visa – applicants claimed they would suffer persecution by a relative for reasons of political opinion – whether jurisdictional error - whether failure to consider applicants' claims of political persecution – whether an error of law in consideration of so-called agents of persecution principle – whether Tribunal erred in its consideration of whether the applicants could relocate within the Philippines
Migration Act 1958, s 36, s 476(1) Migration Regulations, Schedule 2, clause 866.221
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 referred Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 referred Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 referred Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 referred Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred CHARLIE VARGAS & ORS v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 206 of 2000 KENNY J 1 AUGUST 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 206 OF 2000
BETWEEN: CHARLIE VARGAS
First Applicant
LYLE BRANOTT VARGAS
Second Applicant
ANGELITA VARGAS
Third Applicant
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: KENNY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate