Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Crozier, in the matter of an application for Writs of Certiorari and Mandamus against the Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2001] FCA 1031 INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether termination of employment harsh, unjust or unreasonable – whether jurisdictional error in first respondents' decision – factors to be considered under s 170CG(3) – whether valid reason for termination related to the capacity of employee – meaning of "capacity" – whether there can be valid reason related to capacity when employee is performing to his or her best ability but not satisfying job requirements – failure by employer to provide procedural fairness – matters of evidential weight and cogency for Full Bench WORDS & PHRASES – "capacity" Workplace Relations Act 1996, s 170CE(1)(a), s 170CG(3)
Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 applied
IN THE MATTER of an application for Writs of Certiorari and Mandamus against VICE PRESIDENT ROSS, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT ACTON and COMMISSIONER CRIBB (Members of a Full Bench of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission) AND PALAZZO CORPORATION PTY LTD trading as NOBLE PARK STORAGE & TRANSPORT (ACN 006 471 834); Ex Parte PETER CROZIER
V 52 of 2001
GRAY, BRANSON & KENNY JJ
1 AUGUST 2001
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 52 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER of an Application for Writs Of Certiorari and Mandamus against:
VICE PRESIDENT ROSS
and
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT ACTON
and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate