Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Rose v The State of SA [2001] FCA 1051
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 82(2) Federal Court Rules O 78 r 31 PETER DE ROSE AND OTHERS v THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS NO SG 6001 OF 1996 O'LOUGHLIN J 13 JULY 2001 ILINTJITJARA
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 6001 OF 1996
BETWEEN: PETER DE ROSE
FIRST APPLICANT
OWEN KUNMANARA
SECOND APPLICANT
PETER TJUTJATJA
THIRD APPLICANT
JOHNNY WIMITJA DE ROSE
FOURTH APPLICANT
MICHAEL MITAKIKI
FIFTH APPLICANT
PANNIKAN BAKER
SIXTH APPLICANT
PEGGY CULLINAN
SEVENTH APPLICANT
RINI KULYURU
EIGHTH APPLICANT
PUNA YANIMA
NINTH APPLICANT
JULIE TJAMI
TENTH APPLICANT
SADIE SINGER
ELEVENTH APPLICANT
WHISKEY TJUKANKU
TWELTH APPLICANT
AND: THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
R D FULLER PTY LTD AND DOUGLAS CLARENCE FULLER
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: O'LOUGHLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 JULY 2001
WHERE MADE: ILINTJITJARA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application for a change of venue be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 6001 OF 1996
BETWEEN: PETER DE ROSE
FIRST APPLICANT
OWEN KUNMANARA
SECOND APPLICANT
PETER TJUTJATJA
THIRD APPLICANT
JOHNNY WIMITJA DE ROSE
FOURTH APPLICANT
MICHAEL MITAKIKI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate