Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ahmadi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1070
MIGRATION – Refugee application – Judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming refusal of protection visa – Claim of fear of persecution by reason of religion – Applicant claimed to have long been critical of Islamic orthodoxy and practices – Applicant claimed to have been denied government employment for "not praying" and to have become a Christian since arrival in Australia – Reference in Tribunal's reasons to friend of applicant warning him he was mortad because of his comments about religious matters – Tribunal disbelieved evidence of the warning on the basis that applicant had "changed his evidence" – Whether there was evidence or other material to justify the finding of changed evidence – Tribunal accepted that applicant was excluded by reason of religion from public employment but said this was not "persecution" because applicant could obtain private employment in a different field – Whether Tribunal fell into error of law in failing to appreciate necessity of making a judgment of degree in relation to exclusion from public employment – Whether Tribunal erred in relation to finding about applicant's likely reception on return to Iran. Migration Act 1958 s 476(1)(a), (g) and (4). BABAK AHMADI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W 27 of 2001 WILCOX J 8 AUGUST 2001 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN PERTH)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA W 27 of 2001
DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: BABAK AHMADI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN PERTH)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the said Tribunal to be redetermined according to law and, for that purpose, the Tribunal be constituted by a member or members other than the member who made the decision set aside. 3. The respondent, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, pay the costs (if any) incurred by the applicant, Babak Ahmadi, in connection with the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate