Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc v Bradley [2001] FCA 1080
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery of documents – Claim of public interest immunity – Northern Territory government documents – Internal memoranda relating to proposed statutory amendments and powers of Administrator, drafts of Cabinet submission, final Cabinet submission and record of formal Cabinet decision – No documents revealing Cabinet deliberations – Claim of public interest immunity disallowed. Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 referred to. Commonwealth of Australia v Northern Land Council (1993) 176 CLR 604 distinguished. Commonwealth of Australia v Northern Land Council (1991) 30 FCR 1 applied. NORTH AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE INC v HUGH BURTON BRADLEY and NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA D 17 of 2001 WILCOX J MELBOURNE (HEARD IN SYDNEY) 10 AUGUST 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY D 17 of 2001
BETWEEN: NORTH AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE INC
APPLICANT
AND: HUGH BURTON BRADLEY
FIRST RESPONDENT
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The claim of public interest immunity made by the second respondent in respect of certain documents listed in that respondent's Supplementary List of Documents be disallowed. 2. The second respondent forthwith produce the said documents for inspection by other parties. 3. The costs of the application in respect of public interest immunity be the applicant's costs in the principal proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate