Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Silly Solly v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1095
TAXATION - Proceedings set down for hearing of appeal to the Court against income assessment issued by the Commissioner of Taxation against taxpayer company – matters in dispute potentially overlap with those the subject of adverse assessments subsequently issued to companies related to or associated with the taxpayer company - application for addition of further grounds for appeal against the assessment levied against the taxpayer company and to adduce evidence in support of such further grounds – application refused at first instance – extent to which additional evidence might be adduced though out of time fixed by trial timetable.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Part IVA, ss 80G, 177 Arthur Murray (NSW) Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 114 CLR 314 SILLY SOLLY MANAGEMENT PTY LTD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Q139 OF 2001 WHITLAM, KIEFEL & CONTI JJ BRISBANE 13 AUGUST 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q139 OF 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SILLY SOLLY MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WHITLAM, KIEFEL & CONTI JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 13 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Application for leave to appeal refused. 2. Applicant to pay the Respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q139 OF 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SILLY SOLLY MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
APPLICANT
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate