Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sandoval v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1109
JOSE LUIS SANDOVAL AND PENELOPE RUTH FENNER v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V794 of 2001 GRAY J 3 AUGUST 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 794 of 2001
BETWEEN: JOSE LUIS SANDOVAL
FIRST APPLICANT
PENELOPE RUTH FENNER
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GRAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT NOTES THAT the applicants by their counsel have given the usual undertaking as to damages.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Until 4.15 pm on Tuesday 7 August 2001 or further order the respondent by himself, his servants or agents be restrained from removing the first applicant from Australia. 2. The applicants file and serve any amended application and any affidavit on which they may seek to rely on the hearing of the application for a further interlocutory injunction by 12.00 noon on Monday 6 August 2001. 3. The application for a further interlocutory injunction be listed for hearing at 10.15 am on Tuesday 7 August 2001. 4. The costs of this evening's application be reserved. 5. Service of this order be effected by telephone to Mr Michael Lim or Ms Lyn McKirdy or such other officer as may be in charge of the administration of the operations of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs at Melbourne Airport on 1300 655 192. 6. Liberty be reserved to apply on short notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 794 of 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate