Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ragunathan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1142
MIGRATION – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – whether procedures required to be observed by s 476(1)(a) were observed – whether Tribunal failed to sufficiently set out reasons and findings on material questions of fact – whether jurisdictional error – whether Tribunal's decision not authorised by the Act – whether reviewable error of law made by Tribunal – whether Tribunal failed to properly consider the applicant's claim – whether Tribunal failed to take relevant matters into consideration – whether Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider consequences if it were wrong on findings of fact WORDS AND PHRASES – "What if I am wrong" Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR - followed Chhour v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 911 - followed Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 103 - cited Gamaethige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 565 - cited Khan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 736 - followed Li Shi Ping v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 35 ALD 225 - followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai (2000) 106 FCR 426 -followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) CLR 559 at 576 - followed Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24 - followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 -followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] 98 FCR 469 - not followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 - followed Re The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 - cited Sean Investments Pty Ltd v MacKellar (1981) 38 ALR 363 – followed Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCR 425 - followed War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; Exparte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228 - cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate